It goes without saying that the Satyam affair has deepened the pall of gloom over equity mutual funds. Being a leading star of the country’s business firmament, Satyam has been a fixture in many mutual fund portfolios, and justifiably so. In mid-December, when the first inkling of problems at Satyam appeared, the company’s stock price fell sharply. At the time, a number of mutual funds reduced their holdings in Satyam. However, some funds also increased their holdings.
Although this looks like the wrong thing to have done now, that’s just in hindsight. At that time, it was a perfectly legitimate investment decisions either by a mutual fund or by an individual investor. The logic was that Raju’s attempt to take out cash for the Maytas acquisitions had been stymied. The shareholders’ revolt that Raju faced would discourage him from attempting anything similar in the future. The company’s business was intact, its massive cash bank-balance was intact, but its stock price had fallen. That added up to a reasonable case for buying the stock, which a number of mutual funds appeared to have done.
Some days later, it came out that members of Raju family had lost a large chunk of their stake in the company because they had taken loans by mortgaging their shares. As the price had fallen, they had been unable to redeem the mortgage and the lenders had sold off some of the shares. Most investors saw this as positive news. If Rajus were on their way out, then surely this was good news for Satyam. The case for investing in Satyam was actually strong at that point.
It was only on the morning of January 7, when Raju dropped the bombshell, did it become clear that Satyam’s fundamental numbers were cooked-up and no one could really guess how much the shares would worth. On that day, many mutual funds (and other institutional investors) sold their entire Satyam stake. Depending on the price they got, different funds’ NAV took a hit of different magnitude. Since funds’ declare their portfolio only at month end, we don’t know the precise magnitude of the loss.
However, the highest exposure that any diversified fund had to Satyam on December 31 was about 8 per cent. However, the average was just 1.5 per cent. For the entire mutual fund industry, December 31 holdings in Satyam Computers add up to around Rs 670 crore, which is by any estimate an extremely small part of MF investors’ equity holdings.
There’s no way that any investment manager or investment analyst can be blamed for not foreseeing the Satyam debacle. Everything boiled down to trusting Satyam’s accounts. Sure, there are companies in which investors expect such manipulations and those companies are treated accordingly. Mutual funds ignore them and the markets punish them with lower valuations than their published profits suggest. However, if the gap between expectation and reality is as wide as it was in the Satyam’s case, then nothing can be done.
However, as mentioned earlier, mutual fund investors’ losses in Satyam have been quite small. This demonstrates the value of diversification. If you are in non-specific funds that are diversified across sectors, then there are very little chance of serious damage to your portfolio.
